Shakespeare, the Einstein of his time, changed the intrepid minds of many influential people in the Elizabethan era, including King Edward I. In his greatest work, Macbeth, showed us that “ foul is fair and foul is fair” in the relationship between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth; revealing the dominant role of women over men. Lady Macbeth gains great dominion over Macbeth's will by destroying his manhood. She conveys that his doubts about the assassination signify his lack of ambition and value of being a man. He says that a real man should not only have the audacity to create a difficult situation, but should also practice his word of honor. Lady Macbeth then strategically provides the most horrendous example regarding the breaking of the child's skull, which further criticizes Macbeth's scared attitude which contrasts with most women This pushes Macbeth to act according to his male honor. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Shakespeare shows how Lady Macbeth shows her true self as she says in the play “If she had not been so like my father, I would have done It.” This threefold meaning is clearly shown. The first meaning, if you look at it literally, is trying to convey that he looked a lot like his father, which shows full commitment and trust towards his parents. This showed that there is so much undivided love within her for her parents that she disabled and caned her, just like any other child would do. However, it may be that because her parents gave birth to her, she is grateful for it and does not want to kill them. Since Macbeth was called "noble", he would surely give Lady Macbeth's parents the same respect that Macbeth would give to Macbeth. to his parents and would never think of scratching them, let alone killing them. This shows how Lady Macbeth has slowly and carefully invaded Macbeth's mind and brainwashed him so much that he does not truly deny the thought of killing King Duncan. This also shows that Macbeth has given her nothing and so in the end the relationship is useless and his love is false. The second meaning would be the biblical image of God as Lady Macbeth says "he", which shows that Lady Macbeth's thoughts are the more powerful you are, the more divine you are. He couldn't kill God because he didn't have enough power. He wanted the lust for power and although he committed sinful acts such as killing a child, he is not at the level God is at and therefore could not kill him. Because Macbeth was given the title Thane of Glamis and Thane of Cawdor, she believes he has power. Despite this, Lady Macbeth wants more and more power and therefore forces Macbeth to kill King Duncan so that, as his equal half in Macbeth and Lady Macbeth's relationship, in the eyes of the audience, he ultimately receives more power. This strongly demonstrates how the relationship is not a relationship but is simply a ventriloquist and a puppet, where the ventriloquist is Lady Macbeth where she is manipulating the puppet who is Macbeth so that he can receive laughter and money, which is very similar to power and greed . The third and most important is the power of greed that he truly desired. She alone convinced Macbeth to kill King Duncan. It is a very strong perception that Lady Macbeth put forward as she stated "I would". This showed that he had used it as an excuse rather than to show weakness; showing how he didn't want to seem weak in front of Macbeth, which would convey to the audience that he wants to be equal or even superior to Macbeth in the relationship. This competition between them shows how it is a simple game rather than a relationship created by God.
tags