When considering the question between expressing deracialization or blackness in the black political world, history serves as a model for where each type of expression takes us. To choose between these two types of politics, we must first know where we want to be led. Deracialization only gives us assimilation at the expense of equality. Blackness, however, allows for political self-sufficiency, respect, and authority. The only logical move for black politics in the coming years is one that coincides with the black liberation movement. Blacks will not achieve parity with whites through deracialization, but rather by asserting their racial identity to have a policy that serves to benefit blacks. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Political blackness refers to the racialization of black politics as opposed to its deracialization. The term “Blackness” never refers only to phenotype. Political blackness has more to do with focusing on the specific needs of the black community. As a politician who represents the majority of black voters, your politics must be different than if you represented the majority of white voters. The reason for this is that the social, political and economic factors surrounding the black community are markedly different. For example, drug abuse, crime, education, and social programs need to be handled differently in black communities. For example, in an affluent white community, the way to combat drug abuse might be through tougher laws, increasing penalties, or building more rehab centers. These methods may not have the same effect, or even have a negative effect in black communities. The solution may be to alleviate poverty, increase opportunity, create community programs for teens, and even combat the structure of racism of which those communities are a product. In the 1970s and 1980s, during the black power movement, black community leaders were determined to pursue black political goals and put community and race at the center of everything. Even during the civil rights and black nationalist movement of the 1960s, white politicians were also required to recognize and address racial issues and what the black population specifically wanted. The only time Black people in America have been relevant to American history is when we put ourselves first and demand representation and recognition, no matter what. The moments when Black people tried to assimilate into American society were when we were most downtrodden, with our freedoms severely limited. Political blackness is essential to the survival and liberation of the black community. If the needs of the black population in America are never addressed by practical leaders, not only will black people remain stagnant in terms of social and economic mobility, as well as continue to suffer racism from American society at large. The best move for black politics in the near future is to create a solid black political base. It might look like a black political party or simply black people united by common political concerns. This would mean greater autonomy for black leaders and greater representation for black voters, thus greater self-confidence in black politics. Black leaders would not need to deracialize or move to the center if they did not need to gain white support and voters to stay in office. There would be one insteadsolid and united black political base to support these leaders by giving them substantive representation. The policy of deracialization, however, downplays the importance of race and does not address the unique political, social, and economic needs of the Black population. This is an attempt to assimilate with whites and gain their support. Deracialization policies in an extremely racialized society make no sense. What this does is ignore the deeply rooted problems related to race in America and as they continue to torment and oppress black people. Black leaders who choose to deracialize do a disservice to their communities and do not practice Black politics. Once again black politics is about addressing the unique conditions of the black community and thinking/acting from a black worldview, if none of these things are practiced then you are a mainstream, standard, co-opted politician. As long as the community represented is black, deracialization is not an option; if it were, anyone would be able to successfully represent the black community. The only time deracialization would be an option would be if the idea of ​​“blackness” was dissolved and blacks achieved full equality with whites, meaning they would no longer need to band together and fight over basis of race because they are no longer oppressed because of race. It. The idea that one must deracialize in a highly racialized political world is disenfranchising, in the sense that you have no voice to control your political destiny as a black person, so other (white) people control it for you. If existing disparities between blacks and whites are due to racial discrimination and inequality, how can these issues be addressed through color-blind tactics that avoid directly discussing racism? In this post-racial era, the lack of racial consciousness and the deracialization practiced and encouraged by black leaders can worsen perceptions of race in America. For the current generation who have been prevented from learning about the oppression that produced the results that can be seen in the Black community today, this creates a serious disconnect. What is happening is that Americans are rationalizing existing disparities. For example, a young child might observe these disparities (where some people tend to live, work, go to school, and behave well). Our company does not discuss these disparities and their historical context, nor the solutions implemented to remedy them. Therefore, “…if we are actively de-emphasizing discussion of racism and discrimination – in other words, if we are eliminating the context needed to understand the phenomena those children are observing – young people will likely grow up assuming that inequality it's "just the way things are" or, worse, that the disparities must be due to the fact that some people are simply "better" than others. In short, post-racial liberalism in the name of colorblindness can reinforce racial thinking: the final irony (Tim Wise).” For example, Barack Obama's presidency was supposed to be deracialized, a symbol of the “post-racial” society we have achieved, however, some of the worst racial tensions of this century emerged during his presidency. How did he respond? Usually, not addressing racial factors head-on. Ultimately, this does not make the problems that Black people have with racial inequality legitimate, and it appears that the burden of solving these problems falls on Black people rather than addressing them as a nation. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay For too long, Black voices are.