Index IntroductionPreference of one parent over the otherAdvantages of having siblings: first friendsImplications of the studySummaryConclusionsReferencesIntroductionProblems of fidelity, separation, lack of communication and conflicts due to the difference in La personality is a common problem among participants' parents. Witnessing marital conflict can influence how a child adjusts to problems he or she may face (Kelly, 2000). Seeing that parents are the primary role models for children, children will observe and adapt to the way their parents deal with their problems, for example if a parent approaches a situation with aggression and violence, their child may follow suit the example (Bandura, 1977). Few participants witnessed serious verbal and even physical conflicts between their parents. Furthermore, some participants also received corporal punishment as a way of discipline from their parents. Participants also stated that when faced with certain problems, they tend to engage in delinquent or violent behaviors to relieve their frustrations, highlighting the need for positive coping mechanisms. On the other hand, the benefits of having siblings, such as emotional support and a close friendship, can provide a buffer against the negative effects of family conflict and contribute to healthier outcomes (insert benefits of having siblings). These behaviors include substance use. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay From a child's early age, patterns are created between parent and child that would continue throughout the individual's life (Erickson, Korfmacher , & Egeland, 1992). In addition to the observations a child may make about his parents' relationship, the relationship between child and parent is also taken into account. It is essential that a child has and feels the affection of his parents in order to develop healthily in terms of psychological well-being. Lack of early affection in the parent-child relationship can have harmful effects on the child (Benares & Villarama, 2002). As mentioned by participants, few have experienced the lack of affection and effective communication with their parents from an early age to today as young adults. This led to a strained relationship with parents. Preference of one parent over the other Most participants have an attachment to their father or mother. Even though there is a connection with one parent, it should still be noted that having an unstable relationship with the other parent can still have harmful effects on the child (Keller, Catalano, Haggerty, & Fleming, 2002). Parents with whom the participant described a negative relationship did not show affection toward their parents during the interview. Some of the participants used the words “narrow-minded, judgmental, severe, dominant, conservative, detached” to describe their parents' personality, which plays a vital role in determining the relationship between parent and child because his is the way which they perceive their child to be. parent. Some participants have felt strong animosity towards one of their parents and hope to never be like them. One participant, even one of his parents, walked out of his life. One participant also stated that although her parents continue to discover her delinquent behavior, she continues to do so anyway, without caring what her parents think. The same participant also mentioned that her parents are extremely strict with her in terms of going out, curfew, and relationships. Behaviorsaggressive, childhood behavioral problems, and delinquent behavior can be caused by overly strict and harsh parenting, and is actually more common with this type of parenting style (Rosli, 2009). This type of behavior could be used as a protest against the treatment the child suffers from the parents. Furthermore, many of the participants were not open enough with their parents to talk to them about their daily lives, romantic interests, emotional problems, etc., due to the fact that it can evoke negative feelings. These negative feelings would then be returned to them with violent yelling, arguments, and even physical hits when they were younger. Benefits of Having Siblings: First Friends Most participants have a positive relationship with their siblings. They take part in the same activities, practice effective communication and support each other. Participants who were close to their siblings in age railed against their parents together because they were the only other people who knew how their parents really behaved. Five participants responded that their siblings know that they use recreational substances. Many feel comfortable with their siblings as they can share their daily thoughts and activities without feeling judgment coming from the other side. The lack of closeness that one participant felt with his parents is reflected in his siblings. Furthermore, parents are considered authority figures (Mercer & Kohn, 1980) and, therefore, have more control over them, unlike their siblings who are more or less on par with them. Siblings have fewer emotional obligations and can influence and advise each other in a nonpossessive manner (Bank & Kahn, 1975). Therefore, a common feature of the substance user's relationship with siblings would be the presence of a sibling bond. Substance users have mentioned having petty arguments with their siblings, but this is considered normal as it inevitably happens. One specific participant has a negative relationship with all of his siblings while growing up. He lives separately from his siblings and this has greatly eliminated the possibility of forming close, personal relationships with them. These negative interactions reign due to intense conflict and their non-existent interaction afterwards. Implications of the Study This chapter will present the summary of the findings, conclusions and recommendations based on the data analyzed in the previous chapter. Limitations of the study were identified. The perception of college recreational substance users by their families and what that perception has on their substance use was studied through interviews that allowed participants to offer their narrative on this topic. Summary The large and extensive amount of studies on substance addiction is currently available, while there is a huge inadequacy of research on recreational substance use (Halperin, 2018). Producing an altered state of consciousness for pleasure by modifying the perceptions, feelings, and emotions of the user is how recreational substances work (Siquilini, et al., 2005). Previous studies conducted have suggested that one of the major factors contributing to substance use is incidents in the substance user's family (Caday, 2017; Tarter, et al., 2010). This study described and analyzed substance user perceptions of their family's relationship and what these perceptions have in their substance use. Specifically, it addressed the perceived effect of the parent-parent relationship, parent-child relationship, and sibling-sibling relationship on recreational substance use.Family relationships show bilateral directional arrows where the perception of family relationships influences the three types of family relationships, and how the three types of family relationships affect the perception of the substance user. Through a two-sided framework, different types of family relationships show the possibilities of different perceptions of a substance user regarding an individual's perception of their family relationships. The study used a qualitative research design, along with narrative data analysis. The participants are 10 Filipino university students aged between 18 and 25 years and were recruited through purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview was used to obtain the necessary data. The questions were designed to explore subjects' substance experience and existing family relationships. Most participants believed they had a relatively positive family relationship. Despite the presence of conflicts and lack of communication, they were good as a whole unit. Breaking it down into parent-parent relationships is completely different. Issues of fidelity, separation, hostile communication, differences in values ​​are the prevalent circumstances of the participants' parents. There are parents who spend little time together and do not show understanding and concern for their spouse. Regarding the participants' relationship with their parents, almost all were inconsistent, showing only one-sided attachment to a specific parent. The subjects all suffer from negative parental relationships. Rigor, disconnection, and dissimilar characteristics created an unfavorable relationship between parents and participants. This led the parties involved to distance themselves from each other. Finally, sibling relationships were mostly pleasant. Substance users show enough concern to bond with their siblings. Very few of these relationships were distant. Almost all participants can do activities and share interests with their siblings. Some even use recreational substances together. This also revealed that the substance user goes through certain stages compensating for the deficiencies of a positive parental relationship while not neglecting the need for sibling bonding. In targeting substance use in families, the family environment plays an important role (Duffy, et al., 2010). The ways of behaving among family members present components for the expression of intrinsic vulnerability to substance use. Family processes, structure, and systems play a role in the nature and progression of a loved one's substance use (Forrester & Harwin, 2008). Conclusions As a prerequisite for survival, the family is a vital socializing foundation whose main purpose is to ensure types of behavior normalized by affection, culture and full protection towards its members (Medeiros, 2013). A complete family history on assessment is critical to understanding risk and factors involved in substance use behavior. Awareness of certain family interactions and relationships, along with parental profiles and children's residential circumstances, is of paramount importance in discerning the nature and progression of a family member's substance use. Substance use may be a coping behavior, driven by motivation to achieve balance and stability within the family – with substance use itself contributing to dysfunctional flows (Kaufman, 1981). Substance use is understood by theoretical frameworks such as family systems theory, and stress-coping health theory, and an attempt is made to disentangle the processesfamily members who contribute to ongoing problem behavior. “Family systems theory: the substance user provides a mechanism for coping with stress, making the individual helpless and dependent on the family; The overwhelming feeling of a tragedy experienced by the family serves as a threat to the family system, with the potential for family breakdown (Bowen, 1978).” “Stress-Health Management Framework: Family stress resulting from a tragedy is reduced through drug use, shifting distress from the tragedy to the use of the substance (Hanson & Estes, 1977). “Poor welfare and coalitions between family members and the substance user have effectively divided the family. This then reduces relationships to suffering in disengaged interactions (Forrester and Harwin, 2008). Several studies refer to communication difficulties within the family environment. Feelings are not expressed freely, gestures of love and affection are often missing. Interpersonal conflicts are dealt with in a counterproductive way. Even family interaction can be cold and lifeless, becoming alive when dealing with substance use (Hawson & Estes, 1977). Dysfunctional family relationships may have led the family member down a path to substance use and to continue doing so. Families with inadequate interaction have difficulty adjusting to such phases of their life cycle and tend to get stuck trying to cope with stress. These crisis phases can also be considered as traumatic losses, which have been described as contributing to substance use in the family context (Haley, 1973). Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Family disruptions hinder normative levels of supervision and support among parents, subsequently increasing their children's risk of substance use (Moor, et al., 2015). Stress and distress suggest that certain family structures tend to foster higher levels of distress and negative affect among young people, especially as some types are linked to residential mobility, changes in parenting styles, and relationships when biological parents remarry. , and general social upheaval. Wheaton and Montazer, 2010). Stressful experiences and distress are commonly on the same wavelength as substance use. It often serves as a coping or escape mechanism when they experience feelings of distress, anxiety, and negative affect (Elkington, Bauermeister, & Zimmerman, 2010). BibliographyBandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Benares, C. P., & Villarama, R. A. (2002). The influence of the father-daughter relationship on women's attitudes towards interpersonal relationships. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 99-110. Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York, NY: Jason Aronson.Caday, J. (2017). Predictors of alcohol abuse among college students: An exploratory study. Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2), 52-61.Duffy, M., Gilligan, R., Davenport, L., & Gormley, M. (2010). Substance abuse and child well-being: the role of social work. Practice, 22(4), 231-246. Elkington, K. S., Bauermeister, J. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2010). Do parents and peers matter? A prospective social-ecological examination of substance use and sexual risk among African American youth. Journal of Adolescent, 33(4), 1-12. Erickson, M. F., Korfmacher, J., & Egeland, B. (1992). Family group psychotherapy with adolescents: A step-by-step treatment manual. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Forrester, D., & Harwin, J. (2008). Parental substance abuse and child well-being.,56.