In her article “Beyond Anger”, Martha C Nussbaum discusses the causes and weakness of anger and suggests that people should manage their anger. The article was published in 2016 in Aeon (2018), an independent digital magazine that publishes thoughtful and thought-provoking articles covering multiple topics. The article addresses audiences such as post-secondary students, researchers, and “people” (2018, p. 407) who experience anger in their ordinary lives and feel the need to have a deep understanding of this strong emotion. In his article, Nussbaum successfully defends his ideas with convincing arguments and effectively captures his target audience through his solid arguments and persuasive discussions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Nussbaum uses an argument scheme to organize this article and presents his idea about the negative aspects of anger, right at the beginning. In the middle section, he uses examples to support his thesis about the irrationality of anger, from paragraphs two to seven (pp. 407-409). Nussbaum also leads a persuasive argument and tells readers about Nelson Mandela's real-life example to send a message that anger will not help them achieve future progress. He fully states his opposing views in one paragraph and then refutes them in the next, providing a transition and connection to encourage readers to understand his statement and identify why he made it. Nussbaum begins the article with his statement describing anger as a “poisonous” (p. 407) and “destructive” (p. 407) emotion that people use to defend personal pride. He emphasizes that anger represents the negative emotion that people deal with every day because it is our natural reaction to insults and inequality, immediately capturing readers' attention as it leads them to connect these feelings to their own lives. In the middle section, the views of Aristotle and other “Western philosophers” (p. 407) are used to define anger as people's desire or hope for retribution against wrongdoers, establishing the credibility of the information provided. In the next paragraph, Nussbaum states his thesis that the idea of ​​reimbursement is irrational and "nonsense" as it does not encourage people to alleviate the pain suffered (p. 408). In paragraph four (p. 408), he uses an example to illustrate that the idea of ​​reimbursement cannot help a rape victim get out of a terrible situation because it will not help her restore everything she has lost and prevent future rapes (p. . 408). The example supports his idea that rebuilding a broken life and focusing on the future is more important than hoping for revenge for wrongdoers. Furthermore, Nussbaum lists "three paths" that an angry person can choose after suffering harm and explains their negative influences, supporting his claim that anger is not helpful in improving people's future status and requires a transition and "far-sightedness" to remedy their situation. unfortunate situation (p. 409). In the rest of the article, the example of Nelson Mandela is cited to demonstrate the importance of abandoning the idea of ​​reimbursement and supporting his “forward-looking” theory (p. 410). From paragraphs nine to fourteen (pp. 409-412), he uses a chronological scheme to demonstrate Mandela's transition, from “fighting a claim for repayment for 27 years of imprisonment” (p. 408) to finally rejecting the intention of reimbursement (p. 409), from prisoner to great leader who united the”..