Europe is not obliged to welcome immigration. Furthermore, immigration is ineffective in global development policy (Carta et al. 2005). Europe is in the midst of a period of peak immigration that appears to be quadrupling population growth. With the level of legal immigration growing significantly, the absence of data on illegal immigration serves to undermine the need for immigrants in Europe. Nations are therefore justified in being concerned about the immigration process and its effect on the various citizens of the nations concerned. Without a decline in immigration, over two million people will be added every decade, making the nations' population unsustainable as time goes on. Considering that most immigrants will move to urban centers, the effect on industrialization and resources will be significant. Compared to previous waves of immigration such as Huguenots, Jews and Asians, they were forced to leave their nations and considering that they were limited in number, the process ended naturally. The current scenario is based on wealth and better living and working conditions among European nations. The enormous disparity in wealth among the world's nations serves to entice individuals from poor nations to seek better living conditions in developed nations (Losonc, 2016: Kochhar and Fry, 2014). With the advent of television and advanced media, news and aspects of developed nations are easily accessible, making it impossible to miss such advertisements. Whether it is family reunification, asylum, work permits and students settling permanently in Europe, for immigrants this is a good opportunity, however, for citizens of European nations, the effect is disastrous and they should be concerned about the current levels of immigration. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The fight against immigration has led to both political and humanitarian campaigns with some condemning while others support the issue. For starters, Europe's population is expected to continue growing (Hajkova and Hajek, 2014). According to Eurostat, the EU's statistical agency, population growth is expected to increase from 376 million to 386 million between 2000 and 2025 (Hajkova and Hajek, 2014). While most immigration advocates argue that the process is necessary for Europe's declining population, immigrants only serve to further increase the population. As the population increases, pressure on natural resources becomes a concern making it essential for Europe to worry. Hypothetically, if the population began to decline, would tapping into the immigration sector be a good way to ensure the nation's livelihood? Another reason for caution is the fact that Europe does not have a declining workforce. In reality, as predicted by the different statistical organization, with an increase in the number of retired women aged 60 to 65 between 2010 and 2020, the workforce is expected to increase, so the threat of relying on immigrants for domestic workforce supply is not necessary. (McNulty, 2017). The increasing entry of women into the labor market also ensures that the workforce is always available. Furthermore, several types of research have established that immigrant labor is expected to drive migration, such that the intent is to increase employment rather than being a necessity. Except for Italy, most European nations are set to have an expanded workforce, with the United Kingdomhas the fastest growing working population. Based on this fact, increased immigration will serve to prevent local citizens from fully realizing the goals and aspirations set in the nation. While accepting immigration is humane, most nations have a responsibility to their citizens for everything else. Another reason why most European nations should be concerned is the fact that immigration is not a substitute for development policy. The process aims to deprive most developing nations of the chance to develop, considering that most educated and enterprising citizens leave their homeland to go to foreign nations. While exporting services provided by skilled individuals serves to bring a few dollars or pounds into their economies, much more would be achieved if individuals remained in their nations and participated in reform practices. This should be a concern for European countries as the poorer economies become, the more the world economy will grow and, eventually, three-quarters of weak economies will be forced to move to developed nations. This will result in an influx and control will be almost impossible. For immigration advocates, the directive that immigrants pay taxes increasing public resources is justified (Kauppinen and Vilkama, 2016). After all, the more funds available to the government, the easier it will be to develop national infrastructure. This fact is true regarding immigrants from North America and Japan. However, this is not true for immigrants from third world countries who are on average less educated, unemployed and require the most benefits. Evaluating the expense against the taxation process, it is clear that it is much more expensive than it is worth. Most immigrants to European nations come from Africa and other Asian nations. The earnings prospects of European nations are therefore compromised, making it impossible to fully state how countries will benefit from their inclusion. This is, therefore, reason enough for nations to be concerned. Another cause for concern is growing inequality. in the nations to which immigrants move (Xu et al., 2016; Hyde et al., 2015). For starters, those who compete with immigrants in the labor market are usually poor and therefore suffer from low wages; with the intervention of immigrants, the competition becomes worse for them. On the other hand, those who employ immigrants enjoy lower costs and therefore more significant profits. For those nations that depend on the real estate market, it becomes difficult for those seeking to own property. The beneficiaries are therefore those who already own several properties. This should be a cause for concern considering that living conditions and standards become too rigid with a few individuals owning and managing the economy while the majority of citizens compete with immigrants for scarce resources. Furthermore, immigrants are bound to win considering they have no choice but to do their best, which will be to the detriment of local citizens. While the population is aging, as argued by Barsch-Supan et al. (2014 pp.224-29), European nations should not rely on immigration as a quick fix. For starters, immigrants also age, so assuming that they will replace the elderly is pointless. Instead, nations should put in place measures and policies to combat this scenario. While the population is aging rapidly in most European countries, birth control measures or guidelines for.