IndexIntroductionWhy should post-secondary education be free?ConclusionReferencesIntroductionShould post-secondary education be free? This is the topic of my essay. While many may say that there should be fees for post-secondary education, I pretty much agree that post-secondary education should be free. In recent years, it has been common in Canada for teenagers to pursue post-secondary education. It is because people understand that education is extremely important. Furthermore, times have evolved. Therefore, if some students have just graduated from secondary school, they will not be able to deal with many different job demands in the future. However, the cost of post-secondary education is a major barrier for young people. Large debts have become commonplace for college graduates, placing barriers where encouragement should be provided. Research has shown that education increases opportunities for students, improves the lives of all of us, and leads to greater overall economic strength in Canada. Considering the importance of pursuing post-secondary education, the Canadian government should provide free post-secondary education. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Why Should Postsecondary Education Be Free? First, if post-secondary school were free, there would be no student loans. Students will not worry about taking out student loans to facilitate their education at their university. This ensures that students remain debt-free. Even after the person goes to school for whatever program they chose, they still have hundreds, maybe even thousands of money to pay back. And when you add this to all the other things you may have to pay, the total becomes a lot of money. And this can leave the student stressed. One of my best friends who entered his first year of college in 2017 said he fell behind and got low grades on his homework. The reason for his low grades was because he didn't know where he would get another $11,000 or more to pay for his tuition. And his parents weren't rich. In total they earned about $80,000. Second, if postsecondary education were free, it would not be limited to only higher-income students. Quality education is one of the public goods that every nation strives to offer to its citizens by implementing relevant educational policies. While in many nations, including Canada, basic education is provided by the state at highly subsidized costs, the financing of post-secondary education pushes people to strain their pockets in both developing and developing countries. in the developed ones. From an economist's perspective, rising prices for postsecondary education have the effect of decreasing the demand for public goods. In this sense, increasing fees for post-secondary education would mean a reduction in levels of accessibility. Many students who complete high school are forced to work because their families do not have enough money to pay for their college education. Raising fees for post-secondary education makes it accessible only to wealthy people. This statement means that less fortunate people would not have the same levels of accessibility as more fortunate members of society. One of my mother's sisters who was planning on going to Humber College had to start working two jobs as a retail store cashier andat a fast-food restaurant at age 16 to get a decent amount of money to help her parents pay for her Third, if post-secondary education was free, they would guarantee the education. Free education is vital because it ensures that every student in a country has a certain level of education. This means that every student has the same opportunity to obtain this level of education on the same scale. And they have access to the types of degrees they would like to pursue in their programs, which consist of associate degree, bachelor's degree, master's degree, doctorate, and PhD. One of my father's friends who lives in Canada said that he wanted to do his master's degree in engineering because he wanted to earn a good amount of money. But he could afford it, so he had to get his degree. Then as soon as he finished his 4 years of university, he immediately went looking for a job. And after saving a decent amount of money he went back for a master's degree. And he said it was worth it, but it was also kind of a waste of time. On the other hand, one could argue that post-secondary education should not be free either. If post-secondary education were free. There are 3 reasons for this. The first is that because free postsecondary education can cause overcrowding of institutions and excessive numbers of graduates devaluing programs, pupils will not bother taking out student loans to facilitate their college education. This ensures that students remain debt-free. Even after the person goes to school for whatever program they chose, they still have hundreds, maybe even thousands of money to pay back. And once institutions are overcrowded, the program you are studying can depreciate. Many people who graduate from college cannot find a job due to the limited number of jobs, but the large number of applicants. The second reason is that there will be financial irresponsibilities. When pupils have debt, they learn many points about financial responsibility. A student loan is a graduate's first vital financial transaction, and making the payments gives them a lesson in how to pay off debt for the future. Additionally, when a student pays off their debt, it helps them build credit. If colleges and universities were tuition-free, these lessons would not be learned and it would be more difficult for graduates to earn good credit. And the final reason why post-secondary education should not be free is that there will be low quality of education. Free education can change the quality of education in the long term. This is because the classrooms will be filled with many people, which means they will have limited resources. Conclusion In conclusion, some people may think differently about free post-secondary education for some good reasons. I somehow believe that post-secondary education should be free because there will be no student loans and there will be a guaranteed education for every student who enrolls in the college or university of their choice. Even if they can't make post-secondary education free. They should decrease the amount of money you are paying for your tuition. These are the reasons why I think post-secondary education should be free. ReferencesArcher, J. (2014). Evidence on free higher education. Guardian Higher Education Network. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2014/feb/24/evidence-free-higher-educationBarr, N. (2003). The economics of the welfare state (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.Carnevale, A.P., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2013). Recovery: Job Growth and Education Requirements through 2020. Georgetown University Center on Education,, 93(2), 249-252.