In the article “Dietary Carbohydrate Intake and Mortality: A Prospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis,” the authors substituting a plant-based diet or fats and proteins of animal origin can be substituted in place of carbohydrates, as well as the link between carbohydrate intake, long lifespan and mortality. They carried out this analysis because people lose weight through low-carb diets, however if the diet persists for a long period of time, it could lead to premature death. The authors did this by examining participants living in the United States of America through interviews about how often they ate certain foods and drinks. They also did so by evaluating plant-based diets and animal-based diets that were replaced with carbohydrates. From their findings, the authors found that both high- and low-carbohydrate diets have a connection to amplified mortality risk and shorter lifespan. Additionally, they also found that plant-based protein and fat diets correlated with lower mortality than animal-based protein and fat diets, which shows how the type of food ingested alters the connection between carbohydrate intake and mortality. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe title represents the findings of the original study quite truthfully. First, the interview results reported in the article illustrate how low carbohydrate intake leads to shorter life expectancy; However, the article also expresses how a high carbohydrate diet can also lead to a shorter life expectancy, which is not shown in the title. Secondly, what helped the title to truly represent the original study is the fact that it says “study suggests”, meaning that time and effort has been put into finding out what a low-carb diet does in mortality terms. Furthermore, they are funded by the National Institutes of Health, a US government agency responsible for biomedical and public health research, which means they believe the research in this article was to show hard facts and nothing more. There is an enormous amount of literature investigating the influence of carbohydrates in an individual's life. For example, replacement of carbohydrates with saturated fatty acids was associated with a higher risk of mortality (CVD), and replacement with total fat was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (Kuijpers et al., 2016). Additionally, individuals training to increase muscle hypertrophy may see beneficial effects with carbohydrate supplementation during high-volume upper-body RE through reduction of catabolism (Smith et al., 2017). In contrast, there are multiple sources showing that dietary carbohydrates have received negative publicity over the past decade following the popularity of high-protein diets for weight loss, and the most recent findings establish that carbohydrates may be “worse of saturated fats” for cardiovascular diseases (Agostino et al., 2015). Furthermore, a diet rich in fats and carbohydrates induces oxidative stress, which causes neuronal damage and interference with synaptic transmission; therefore, a decline in cognitive function (Alzoubi, Khabour, Salah, Hasan, 2013). Specifically, there are numerous articles in the literature on how carbohydrate intake before physical stress can attenuate cortisol concentrations (McAllister et al., 2016)..