A study by the Australian Communications and Media Authority has revealed children as young as 11 report receiving or sending explicit images, shocking I know, but those are the consequences current times of children growing up in a society completely immersed in smartphone technology. For this reason, it is essential to adapt our teaching strategies to ensure that our children are aware of the burden that improper use of social media and online platforms can cause. This also means that sexual health education taught in schools must also adapt to the growing use of sexting, among other things. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Children in school as young as 12 can be taught how to safely send "sexy snaps" via text messages and social media through an online educational tool recommended for use in classrooms. The video is hosted by an Australian website called Rose, which describes itself as "a unique online space where young women can connect with the best digital resources available, helping them navigate life's difficult situations", which I believe is a great thing that is much needed. resource. The safe sexting advice encourages young women to cut out anything that easily identifies the person taking the photo, to stay sober, not to share images of other people and to seek help if you are concerned about a photo. Rosie's video may seem too distant and provocative for young children, but the sad reality is that a study conducted by RMIT and Monash universities showed that 1 in 3 Australians aged 16-19 have been targeted by image-based abuse. So it is obviously necessary to break the silence on this "taboo" topic. Allyson Oliver-Perham, communications expert and co-founder of the website Rosie, said pretending children are not exposed to this material is "naive". It is vital that this naivety is dismantled. We live in 2018, where society is becoming more and more open to accepting previously taboo topics and the way we live is constantly developing, so why does society and, more importantly, parents not accept younger generations using sexting as a way to explore their sexualities. So why don't we give them the resources they need to stay as safe as possible? A program that educates children about sexting safely does not in any way encourage this behavior, but acts as a harm minimization technique. Parents need to understand the power of these devices and the basics of speed and reach when dealing with sexualized and personal images. We know young people engage in this behavior, the facts cannot be ignored. By having these discussions, young people may be less likely to take risks in doing so and may be more likely to discuss any concerns they have with a trusted adult. The introduction of this idea has attracted a lot of criticism as people consider it to be too confrontational for elementary school students. Many people who are against this program often say that it is up to the parents to decide to teach their children these fundamentals, yet this is often not taught. Parents expect schools to teach children about safe drinking, drug use, "real" sex and other forms of cyberbullying. Why do we put a limit on sexting? We generally accept that children should be taught the basics of sex education; use a condom, etc., - in our.