There is an ongoing discussion about whether or not logging areas help prevent fires. There's evidence to show that this goes either way if it's an effective way to help prevent fires or even if it helps slow them down when they do. The argument that it helps has a good starting point because reducing the amount of fuel for a fire will help prevent them. Bill Oliver, a retired Forest Service official, says, “The real thing that needs to go out of the woods are the brush and small-diameter trees that provide fuel for today's megafires. . . It's the big trees that make money. This has long been an obstacle to joint public-private forest restoration and fire mitigation efforts. But there are signs that this is changing. ” But there's also the fact that when an area is deforested, regulations are established about what can and cannot be cut. It allows the trees to have better spacing between each other which allows for healthier growth and also when a fire comes it keeps it from jumping from tree to tree so quickly. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Another benefit of logging is logging roads that allow for better response to fires in the mountains due to fire trucks having the ability to get there instead of having to enter or fight it completely from above. You can also allow people to drive responsibly, hike or otherwise and charge a small amount to allow more money to research more ways to prevent fires and promote healthy forests through methods other than logging. Another way to reduce logging roads and cut piles is to burn certain areas so that all small, easily burnable debris is already gone, so that the chances of a large fire are much less likely, as written in a note from department. by Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. . He says politicians need to start thinking in ecological cycles instead of thinking in political cycles. When a fire is predicted to happen, it doesn't get out of control and burn trees and all kinds of things that shouldn't be burned but instead just burn debris on the ground which will cause a catastrophic fire. When you say that deforestation causes too much pollution, compare that to what kind of pollution happens when there's a big forest fire and then you have to bring in all the necessary equipment to help fight the fire, so you're having pollution from the fire, trucks and other heavy equipment. If they were allowed to write down their responsibilities, then it would be necessary to put people and wildlife in unnecessary danger. The U.S. Forest Service says 190 million acres of forest are at risk of catastrophic fires, and 60 million of those are in national parks. This is all due to federal mismanagement of forests. An alternative view is that logging and logging are both harmful to the environment, regardless of what benefits people think they are. We still need the wood from logging, but some people think we should reduce what is logged a lot when they consider the benefits versus the negatives of logging and that there is a small chance of a forest fire occurring. of course than an accident that occurs during the registration process. People say that some areas should not be touched.