Gun control has been a huge controversy for many years, so many people believe that if we had strict gun laws the crime rate would decrease. Is it true that if we control guns, we control violence? Is gun control necessary? And what research and testing is needed to find the answer? These are some of the many questions I came across while researching the topic and found many explanations that help better understand gun control. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Being someone who is pro-gun, always listen to one of the biggest debates in today's society regarding gun control with the famous quote from the National Rifle Association they say, "Guns don't kill, people do" . The weapons were originally designed for the military, yes, they were made to produce a certain type of violence, but for a strong defense against enemies. People today have taken guns and turned them into a bad thing, they misuse them and they are a major factor in many crimes, from robbery, to murder and even suicides, but this means that the blame should be on the 'weapon? Bill Whittle, is an American conservative blogger and political commentator. After the 2012 presidential election, Whittle gave a speech known as the “Virtual President of the United States,” in which he wanted to bring common sense to modern politics. It's about how we deny the obvious by wanting to ban guns because we know deep down that we can't ban violence, murder, and insanity, which are the real reasons for crimes. As I listened to his speech I thought about how we believe we can control something like firearms. Society is always looking for something or someone to blame. Let's say we somehow found a way to control guns or even get rid of them completely, people will then try to ban pocket knives, or even something as common as a wrench or a hammer, we will always be looking for something to blame, something other than the obvious, which is that if someone wants to kill, they will find a way. The huge desire to ban assault rifles is a major argument when it comes to gun control, saying they are dangerous and are consistently used in gun-related murders. In 2016 there were 374 murders involving all types of rifles, when there were 1,604 knife murders, which is 5 times more murders. So, does this mean we need to have control over the knives now? Now many of us believe that we must choose a side: oppose the guns or support them. In a newspaper article written by Hugh Lafollette titled Gun Control, Lafollette explains that we do not need to decide whether we support or oppose, but to decide “who can own which guns and under what conditions.” Being pro-gun, I don't think gun is a necessary action, completely. To explain this, I think we should have a little more rigorous process when purchasing a gun, we should check the parts available to turn your gun into an automatic weapon, but we shouldn't ban them completely. I believe there are many other factors that come into play when it comes to gun violence, including religion, race, age, poverty levels, violent media, drugs, and parenting. In 1992 the Bureau of Justice Statistics released statistics on homicide rates among adolescents. ages 15 to 19 due to firearms from 1985 to 1990, and the numbers more than tripled for African American adolescents, when they just doubled with allteenagers. Out of 100,000 adolescents taken in total they were 5.8 in 1985 and rose to 14.0 in 1990, while the murders of African American adolescents were 37.5 in 1985 and rose to 105.3 in 1990, which means that most of the murderers were African American teenagers. This shows that race can be a major factor when it comes to gun violence. The Bureau of Justice released statistics on the annual gun victimization rate from 1987 to 1992, they tested age by race and sex, white male, black male, white female, and black female, it began all the way down, but there was a huge noticeable spike in all ages between 16 and 19 and then it started to decline from ages 20 to 24 to age 65 and beyond, but the black male and black female continued to remain a little taller than the white male, and white female. (Carter) Now, racism is a huge problem in the United States too and causes a lot of controversy in our society, but in my opinion if we were able to stop all racism it would also reduce gun crimes. Video games have also shown a huge impact on teenagers over the past 20 years. Open-fire massacres, including the Columbine High School shooting, and the Aurora movie theater shooting in Colorado had one thing in common: violent video games. Now an Iowa State University psychologist says violent media, while a factor, is not the most important. Violent games may elicit hostile impulses and aggressive behavior for a short time, but they are only short-term. But I believe that these little impulses received from violent games trigger other emotions that lead someone to reach the breaking point that leads them to commit these terrible massacres. When it comes to testing gun control there are a couple of research methods that can be used, one is cross-sectional, meaning data collected from many geographic locations in the same year. There is also time series research, which is data collected from a particular area over many years. While these are some of the best testing methods, there are some flaws as well. John R. Lott Jr wrote a book called More Guns, Less Crime Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws, in his book he talks about these methods, he presents an example that helps us understand the difficulty of testing gun control. “Let's say we decide to study an area that had high crime rates and adopted stricter gun laws that ultimately reduced gun crime, but it was still higher than another area that had low crime rates and he hasn't adapted the strict gun laws, has he?” so it seems like stricter gun laws continue to cause a higher crime rate?" Gun control is a never-ending fight, and I know there will never be a firm yes or no on gun bans, but I think we can improve how they are used, trying to eliminate the other factors involved. The League of Nations has many problems and many people believe that violence is the answer Yes, firearms are easy to obtain, yes, they make criminals feel like if they could control any situation and yes, they instill fear in many people, but they are also a good thing Now, I'm not saying that we will live in a perfect world of happiness, and there is no way to banish human emotions, but with everyone. the problems of racism, drugs, gang control and bad parenting, we are creating an environment that pushes people to resort to firearms When we realize that firearms can be a good thing and can prevent them from happening violent acts, used to defend oneself from a criminal, and I believe that if a criminal is faced with a weapon and is stopped by the/.