Topic > Disinterest is essential in the pursuit of knowledge

In the natural sciences, disinterest is not crucial in the pursuit of knowledge and can even be an obstacle. When looking at the natural science of biology, being interested in what you are learning is extremely important. This is because learning biology involves learning many new terminologies and, compared to other natural sciences such as chemistry and physics, relies much more on reading and memorizing terminology than on solving equations. This can make biology extremely boring if someone is disinterested in the subject and can hinder their academics since when a student is disinterested in a subject, it often leaves them unmotivated to continue studying in that subject area. I saw it myself in one of my friends who was in my biology class. It became apparent to me that they had no personal interest in biology and found the subject very boring. This resulted in their grades suffering, as they were not motivated to study or pay attention in class to what the teacher said. This led to my friend becoming even more concerned about the subject and essentially abandoning biology as he had no interest in the subject. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay On the other hand, I find biology to be an interesting, albeit robust, subject, and as such reflective of my dedication to the subject. I don't struggle as much as my friend in class and I enjoy going to biology class. However, I also face the same difficulties that my friend faces when we learn a new topic in class that I am not interested in. In this case, emotions and feelings towards the topic play a vital role in pursuing knowledge. On the contrary, however, excessive personal interest in the natural sciences can be detrimental to the pursuit of knowledge and its diffusion. In this case, disinterest is necessary to pursue knowledge. We also learned about the scientific method in my biology class. The scientific method is how scientists deduce whether a hypothesis has any basis in the real world. As a result, this method is highly regarded and extremely important in all areas of natural sciences. However, in biology class we learned that there is a problem in science, where scientists often downplay or even omit data that does not prove their hypothesis. Furthermore, many companies now pay scientists to prove that their product, or what they are, doing has no harm to the public, even if it ultimately does. This had called into question the reputation of the methodology with which knowledge is produced in the natural sciences. In this case, being disinterested is essential, since science is supposed to be based on reason and not emotion. When scientists are too emotionally attached to their hypotheses, this can lead them to try to do everything they can to prove their results, which ultimately harms the quality of knowledge that would be produced..