However, neither Qatar nor the United Arab Emirates coordinated their military assistance to the Libyan opposition, and in fact supported the various rebel brigades on the ground. This complicated the task of unifying the anti-Gaddafi movement from its early stage and contributed to the movement's subsequent fragmentation after it came to power in October 2011. It also laid the foundation for a political-security rivalry supported by the Qatar and from Qatar. United Arab Emirates. Networks that would erupt in the summer of 2014. It appears that Qatar's policy of trying to identify and ultimately support the victors in conflicts (which were always Islamic groups) bore fruit in August 2011. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Indeed, the brown and white flags of Qatar flew alongside the flag of free Libya over the ruins of Gaddafi's compound: a symbolic and telling moment. However, with the revolutionary ecstasy of 2011 leading to the difficult process of building and unifying institutional and accountable administrative structures in 2012, it has become clear that Qatar has failed to translate short-term gains into long-term influence. Local reactions to Qatar's intentions, perceived or real, have intensified as the extent of the country's commitment on the ground has become more widely known. This was reflected in the July 2012 Constituent Assembly elections, when Balhaj's sole party won just one seat, although Belhaj failed to win in his constituency in Tripoli. Although the failure of the party reflects several factors, including the lack of clarity of the Islamic-secular divide of the other parties and the weakness of the socio-political networks that could not be formed in Libya Gaddafi, the concerns of the public opinion regarding the relationship with Qatar. In determining the rejection of the Belhadj statement. Indeed, even the colors of his party had an impact; Either by accident or on purpose, the colors of the national flag of Qatar were chosen, thus increasing public doubts about its aims and objectives of Qatar. The same constraints that had hindered the monitoring, evaluation and implementation of Qatar's mediation initiatives before 2011 also hampered Qatar's ability to prosecute post-Gaddafi Libya, even with strong new criticism of Qatar's policy. Please note: this is just an example. a customized document now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Qatar's inability to leverage its influence to achieve concrete results in post-conflict Libya reflects the lack of depth in the country's professional diplomatic capabilities and the challenge of institutionalizing the outcomes of largely personal decision-making processes. Furthermore, while the country and other regional and international sources of military and financial support were largely welcomed during the fight against the Gaddafi regime, in the frenetic climate that followed, it became difficult for these external actors to avoid the emergence and choice of sides.