IndexIntroductionBeing Comfortable vs Taking RiskCorrelation between comfort zone and terror zoneConclusionReferencesIntroductionIn the contemporary world, one of the most discussed phenomena is whether taking risks is more important than making carefully planned decisions in professional life to achieve success, or vice versa. HR managers often ask candidates questions that gauge their propensity for risk aversion. Although some management scholars argue that accepting risks is beneficial for professionals to achieve professional success, it is an established truth that success is not based solely on hard work. It also requires individuals to regularly reevaluate their plans and, as they say, “get comfortable being uncomfortable.” In this essay I would like to discuss my position on this topic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Being Comfortable vs Taking Risks In my opinion, making plans regularly is more beneficial than accepting risk for career success in terms of dependence on reality rather than probability and logic of correlation between terror zone and comfort zone. First of all, opponents usually promote their point through concrete cases. However, the problem with this argument is their commitment to selection biases which are one of the most common failures made in the academic sphere. What is selection bias? It is an error that the writer resorts to when selecting parochial elements for his argument, and this leads the hypothesis to be positioned as null. Proponents of risk acceptance generally advocate the failure of selection bias because they exemplify their argument with successful cases, however, they overlook its disastrous effects in successful cases. In short, viewing risk taking as a critical issue to achieve means preferring probability to reality. Correlation between comfort zone and terror zone On the one hand, there is an exact way to pave the way to success. Instead, there is a zero-sum game, all-or-nothing gambling, in other words, success or devastation. A rational individual would naturally select the first option, i.e. reality rather than probability. Second, the risk-accepting side of the debate supports its position using the psychological concepts of terror zone and comfort zone. According to psychologists, the interception area of ​​the terror zone and the comfort zone is the mode in which the human being is most productive. However, they miss the fundamental point that productivity originated from the comfort zone effect along with the strength of the terror zone. That's why the act of taking a risk, which captures you in the terror zone, cannot increase productivity. On the other hand, feeling the stress of obligations will push you into the terror zone while planning assignments will bring you into your comfort zone, as a result, you will remain in the position where you are most productive. Who's to say that productivity leads to success? Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion In conclusion, the issue of “risk acceptance versus careful planning” is a heated debate in the professional world. Although some say that “taking risks is easier to achieve success than making a careful plan,” the. 45-60.