Provide support for your position. In January 2012, a bride sued her photographer for posting photos of her in her underwear. The bride called the photographer and asked that the photos be removed from her website. In the end the bride sued the photographer and lost. You would think this would be an open and shut situation. In my opinion the judge ruled in favor of the photographer because of the contract she signed. It did not specify which photos should not be published and the contract agreed that the photographer could publish all photographs on his website. The judge honored the binding legal contract entered into by both parties. I believe the judge in the soft drinks case and the photographer case honored the reason for the case as there was no violation of law or contract. Judges make decisions in accordance with the law. It has been established that the advertisement is not a legally binding contract nor an offer. I believe the judge ruled in favor of the Soft Drink Company because the soft drink did not violate the advertising law. I believe the judge ruled in favor of the photographer simply because he had a binding legal contract to publish the