CHAPTER VSUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSstructure:• Migration/Remittances. Causes. Positive and negative aspects. • The study • Impact of migration on families ((2)) • Policy recommendations, if any The search for better job opportunities has certainly been a key feature in human life. It has been observed that economic development has been accompanied by large-scale movements of people. And today, remittances are recognized as a major source of income. According to 2013 World Bank estimates, India tops the global remittance rankings with a receipt of $71 billion. In India, however, internal relocation is more evident in correlation with global movement. There has been a growing importance of intra-state relocation due to how over 85% of the workforce is moving within the state (NSSO, 64th round). Thus, keeping intra-state mobility at the center, the objective of this article has been to provide a brief examination of the relationship between remittance earnings and the socio-economic status (SES) of sending migrant households. Through the investigation of written works, it was seen that the existing literature investigates the relationship between emigration income and SES. When a person emigrates abroad, the difference in the exchange rates of the two economies translates into an increase in the standard of living of the migrant's family in the country of origin. However, there are relatively few studies that identify compensation income through intrastate relocation and its effect on the socio-budgetary status of households. In this sense, through this document, the objective was to fill this specific gap. The emphasis here was to investigate the degree to which these receipts are written… mid-paper… positive relationship between remittances and household SES. After migration, the family's financial and social situation evidently improved. However, some negative impacts of migration have been found. These were in the form of hardship for women as it became difficult to manage the family alone and the other problem was the school dropout rate among children as they became more vulnerable to work as unskilled labourers. Radical-leaning academics and NGOs view the movement as fundamentally exploitative and are exceptionally reluctant to acknowledge its more positive views. The mentality towards the movement in India is very negative. Although not explicitly stated, many rural and urban development programs plan to control movement: for example, the Delhi Master Plan aims to control rural-urban migrants. (Kundu, 2003). ((1))